The Gauteng Provincial Government's decision to allocate R52 million for land acquisition has sparked controversy, with the DA criticising the choice of a property in Cullinan, which is allegedly a heritage site containing nearly 200 unmarked graves and historic structures.
According to the DA, the land in question for the relocation of Mamelodi flood victims is a heritage site, stressing the importance of preserving cultural heritage and the environment.
Party Gauteng MPL Leanne De Jager MPL expressed concern that the provincial government’s stance has shown a disregard for preserving our environment and cultural heritage.
“In a recent decision, the Gauteng provincial government allocated R52 million for a 180-hectare property in Cullinan, intended to relocate residents from Mamelodi. This relocation threatens nearly 200 unmarked graves and historic structures, sparking outrage among affected residents and advocates for environmental and cultural preservation,” she said.
She said the DA found the decision to prioritise urban development at the expense of this heritage site both perplexing and disheartening.
“There can be no justification for insisting on investing millions in a project that profoundly disregards the rich historical narratives and cultural significance woven into the fabric of this land,” De Jager said.
Additionally, she said, the DA demands that the Gauteng government reverse its decision to prioritise urbanisation over this sacred space.
She urged the government to find an alternative location for the Mamelodi residents, saying it will ensure that their needs are met while preserving land important to the area's heritage.
She said the DA will conduct a vital oversight inspection of the Cullinan heritage site on January 8 next year with a view to interact with residents of the area and listen to their concerns on the planned urban expansion.
“A DA Gauteng Provincial Government would have considered the rules and regulations in terms of the heritage site and the graveyards that are in the area before proposing any development,” De Jager said.
The party wants the Gauteng government to assess the impact that the development might have on the heritage site and the graveyards.
“These unmarked graves and historic structures reflect the history and culture of the Cullinan residents and those whose loved ones are buried in this land,” De Jager said.
At the time of going for print, the Gauteng Department of Sports, Arts, Culture and Recreation was yet to comment on the DA criticisms that the land identified for the relocation of Mamelodi residents is a heritage site.
Pretoria News